Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially big language designs (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with many smaller sized firms have actually established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes across a large range of markets, including software application advancement, health care, financing, entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and item design. [19] However, issues have been raised about the prospective abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using phony news or deepfakes to deceive or control individuals, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Intellectual residential or commercial property law issues also exist around generative models that are trained on and replicate copyrighted masterpieces. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, researchers in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the effects of producing synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have previously been explored by myth, fiction and approach given that antiquity. [23] The concept of automated art go back at least to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where innovators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually designed machines capable of composing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of creative automations has thrived throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton produced in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been utilized to design natural languages considering that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic artificial intelligence

The academic discipline of synthetic intelligence was developed at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced numerous waves of improvement and optimism in the decades because. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have actually utilized synthetic intelligence to create creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was producing and displaying generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen produced to generate paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI preparing systems, especially computer-aided process preparation, utilized to generate series of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems utilized symbolic AI approaches such as state space search and restriction complete satisfaction and were a “reasonably mature” technology by the early 1990s. They were used to create crisis action prepare for military use, [35] process prepare for making [33] and decision plans such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural internet (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of maker learning utilized both discriminative designs and generative models, to model and anticipate data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the development of deep learning drove progress and research in image category, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this age were normally trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks capable of learning generative models, instead of discriminative ones, for complicated information such as images. These deep generative models were the first to output not just class labels for images however also whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network made it possible for developments in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] causing the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), called GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the capability to generalize unsupervised to several tasks as a Structure design. [40]

The new generative designs introduced throughout this period permitted large neural networks to be trained using not being watched learning or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the monitored knowing normal of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning eliminated the requirement for humans to by hand identify information, enabling bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that could create convincing character voices utilizing minimal training data. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content development, affecting subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more democratized access to premium synthetic intelligence art production from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed unmatched capabilities in creating photorealistic images, artwork, and creates based on text descriptions, leading to prevalent adoption amongst artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT reinvented the availability and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s ability to engage in natural discussions, create imaginative content, assist with coding, and perform various analytical tasks caught international attention and stimulated widespread conversation about AI‘s potential influence on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could reasonably be deemed an early (yet still incomplete) version of a synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘basic human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta released ImageBind, an AI design integrating several techniques consisting of text, images, video, thermal data, 3D information, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI design available in four versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed strategies for “Bard Advanced” powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, launching a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 household of big language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs demonstrated considerable improvements in capabilities throughout different criteria, with Claude 3 Opus significantly surpassing leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually emerged as an international leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents utilizing the innovation, surpassing both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is additional evidenced by China’s intellectual home advancements in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, considerably going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by using not being watched artificial intelligence (conjuring up for instance neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device finding out trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend on the modality or kind of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language designs). They can natural language processing, machine translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as structure designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language designs can be trained on programs language text, permitting them to produce source code for brand-new computer system programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing top quality visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which demonstrated the ability to clone character voices using as low as 15 seconds of training data. [67] The site gained widespread attention for its capability to generate emotionally meaningful speech for different imaginary characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of documented music along with text annotations, in order to create new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been produced, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to simulate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t protected from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists should get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been created that can be produced utilizing a text phrase, genre options, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can create temporally-coherent, in-depth and photorealistic video clips. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the movements of a robotic system to generate brand-new trajectories for movement planning or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “select up blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can perform fundamental thinking in response to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when given the timely pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could likewise be established utilizing linked open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist simplify workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have been integrated into a variety of existing commercially readily available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are likewise available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with up to a couple of billion criteria can work on smartphones, embedded devices, and computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion specifications) can work on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with 10s of billions of criteria can work on laptop or desktop computers. To accomplish an acceptable speed, designs of this size might need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion criterion version of LLaMA can be set up to operate on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI in your area include security of privacy and intellectual property, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular focuses on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That online forum is one of only two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has advocated open-source models for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI safety. [95]

Language models with hundreds of billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, generally run on datacenter computer systems geared up with ranges of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These huge designs are normally accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to meet the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software on the marketplace capable of recognizing text created by generative artificial intelligence (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for identifying generative AI material include digital watermarking, material authentication, information retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have often produced false positives, erroneously implicating students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report details to the federal government when training specific high-impact AI models. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to reveal copyrighted material used to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It of requirements to watermark produced images or videos, guidelines on training information and label quality, constraints on individual data collection, and a standard that generative AI need to “adhere to socialist core worths”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted material

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly readily available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI designers have argued that such training is protected under fair usage, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of reasonable use training have argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works offered to the public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of lawsuits associated with the usage of copyrighted product in training are continuous. Getty Images has sued Stability AI over making use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually sued Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can certify for copyright defense. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works produced by expert system with no human input can not be copyrighted, since they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has likewise begun taking public input to determine if these guidelines need to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from federal governments, organizations, and individuals, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, calls to pause AI experiments, and actions by numerous federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres specified “Generative AI has huge potential for great and wicked at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge global development” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the worldwide economy by 2030, but that its destructive usage “could cause horrific levels of death and damage, widespread injury, and deep psychological damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems actually need to be done by them, provided the difference between computers and human beings, and in between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually led to 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “expert system positions an existential hazard to creative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been seen as a potential obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work issues among underrepresented groups globally remains a vital facet. While AI assures performance improvements and ability acquisition, concerns about job displacement and biased recruiting processes continue among these groups, as outlined in surveys by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more fair society, proactive actions incorporate mitigating predispositions, advocating openness, appreciating privacy and approval, and embracing diverse teams and ethical factors to consider. Strategies involve rerouting policy emphasis on policy, inclusive style, and education’s capacity for customized teaching to take full advantage of advantages while decreasing harms. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI models can show and amplify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For instance, a language design may assume that doctors and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions are typical in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “an image of a CEO” might disproportionately generate pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced information set. A variety of approaches for alleviating predisposition have actually been tried, such as changing input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and change them with another person’s similarity using synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually garnered prevalent attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake celebrity pornographic videos, revenge pornography, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial fraud, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has generated reactions from both industry and government to spot and restrict their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically discovered that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (distributed journal technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to generate controversial statements in the singing style of celebrities, public officials, and other famous people have actually raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have mentioned that they would deal with mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The exact same software application utilized to clone voices has been used on popular artists’ voices to produce tunes that simulate their voices, gaining both significant popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have likewise been utilized to produce better quality or full-length versions of songs that have been leaked or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually also been used to produce brand-new digital artist characters, with some of these receiving adequate attention to get record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually also faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also creating artists which develop impractical or immoral interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to create realistic phony material has actually been made use of in many kinds of cybercrime, including phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been used to develop disinformation and fraud. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that when deepfake videos become completely practical, they would stop appearing exceptional to audiences, potentially leading to uncritical acceptance of false info. [159] Additionally, big language models and other types of text-generation AI have actually been used to develop phony reviews of e-commerce websites to boost ratings. [160] Cybercriminals have actually produced large language models concentrated on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, enabling enemies to acquire assist with hazardous requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their safety restrictions at low expense. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI designs requires an enormous quantity of calculating power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the funds to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have expressed concerns about the ecological effect that the advancement and release of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical energy use. [170] [166] [171] There is also issue that these effects may increase as these models are integrated into commonly used online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods include factoring possible environmental costs prior to model development or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of information centers to reduce electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] constructing more effective device finding out models, [168] [166] [169] lessening the number of times that designs need to be retrained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] regulating for transparency of these models, [167] regulating their energy and water use, [168] motivating scientists to release data on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject matter professionals who understand both maker knowing and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “inferior or unwanted A.I. material in social networks, art, books and … in search results page.” [172] Journalists have actually expressed concerns about the scale of low-grade produced material with respect to social media material moderation, [173] the financial incentives from social networks companies to spread such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific research paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to find higher quality or wanted content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of created content by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a picture of websites, were machine equated. A number of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, specifically for sentences that were translated throughout at least three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had stopped upgrading the information for numerous factors: high expenses for acquiring data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other approaches in the natural language processing neighborhood, and that “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused an explosion of AI-generated content throughout several domains. A research study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely written with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, roughly 17.5% of recently released computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer review text now include content created by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a similar pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that an average of 34 million images have been produced daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been produced using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these produced by models based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI designs, defects in the resulting designs may take place. [185] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this procedure, where each brand-new design is trained on the previous model’s output, leads to progressive deterioration and eventually results in a “design collapse” after several models. [186] Tests have been conducted with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the worth of data collected from genuine human interactions with systems might end up being increasingly important in the existence of LLM-generated content in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial data is often used as an alternative to information produced by real-world occasions. Such information can be deployed to validate mathematical models and to train maker knowing models while maintaining user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The technique is not limited to text generation; image generation has actually been employed to train computer vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to write a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a phony AI-generated interview with former racing motorist Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks because 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “stealthily real”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter amidst the controversy. [192]

Other outlets that have actually released short articles whose content and/or byline have been verified or believed to be created by generative AI designs – often with incorrect material, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – include:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually utilized generative AI to produce articles for a lot of the aforementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced 10s of countless short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based on Generative AI models, triggering concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually traditionally been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have actually likewise been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google reportedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce news stories” based upon input data provided, such as “information of current occasions”. Some news business executives who viewed the pitch described it as” [taking] for given the effort that went into producing precise and artistic newspaper article.” [224]

In February 2024, Google released a program to pay little publishers to compose three articles daily utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not need the knowledge or consent of the sites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it need the published articles to be identified as being created or assisted by these models. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have undergone cybersquatting, with articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed concern that generative AI might have a hazardous effect on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund local news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI companies developing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which sums up news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially additional decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In action to potential pitfalls around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about declining audience trust, outlets around the world, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published standards around how they prepare to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “generally human with some help from AI”. The outcomes of international surveys reported that people were more uneasy with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programs website

Technology website

Artificial basic intelligence – Type of AI with comprehensive abilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that replicates discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of large language model
Large language model – Kind of artificial intelligence design
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is created algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of information retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in machine knowing

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative designs”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, organizations, and governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse simply yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ fight versus AI, people win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the effect of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems collide with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, recovered October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided process preparation: the cutting edge study”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a traditional generative AI organizer based upon the HSTS planning framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a standard spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also add an architectural element explicitly dedicated to world modeling (the mode identifier), and distinguish in between control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine knowing: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are unsupervised multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with not being watched knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some form because ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces possible pictures of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace human beings?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that integrates 6 kinds of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google introduces Gemini-a powerful AI design it says can go beyond GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, exceeding GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a fast new AI model – and a clever brand-new method to interact with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and dangers of foundation designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Purchasing Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please keep in mind that only English voices are available.; Another major feature of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, which included 10,000 “top quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers outlined in a paper the ethical difficulties that they experienced around the advancement of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware producer triggers dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design develop times with brand-new AI-driven part production method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway announces brand-new design”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though existing output is fundamental. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative synthetic intelligence innovations such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of organization software application … the brand-new A.I. features, dubbed Copilot, will be available in some of the company’s most popular business apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function just got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to use generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert adventure”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative synthetic intelligence (AI) will turn into one of the most essential functions for imaginative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and use Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you desire to run LLaMA 2 by yourself machine or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can develop a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated locally, so you don’t require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model at Home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design at home, you will require a computer build with a powerful GPU that can deal with the big amount of information and calculation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust 2 LLM evals today” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to halt sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to stringent U.S. export requirements that restrict how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software application to acknowledge phony AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We checked a new ChatGPT-detector for instructors. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be impossible. That’s a big problem for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI material for safety, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first guideline on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers choose tougher AI rules as draft relocate to last phase”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI guidelines to apply only to items for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise accepting the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office desires to hear what individuals think of AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking video game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art industry supposedly decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of innovative tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that explicitly demands AI regulations to protect authors and the works they create. … The future of generative artificial intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be used to change labor-has end up being an important sticking point for stars going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently understood as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘artificial intelligence postures an existential risk to innovative occupations, and all stars and performers are worthy of agreement language that safeguards them from having their identity and skill exploited without authorization and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries worldwide are worried about AI being a danger to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language designs are prejudiced. Can logic help conserve them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and enhancing security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the challenges of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying state-of-the-art pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech could begin a worldwide showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to increase anti-U.S. influence campaigns, officials state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the obstacles of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of expert system and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at threat from AI-driven disinformation, say professionals”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to tackle deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users accept AI voice clone tool to produce star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record offer with AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get ready for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ forecasts the greatest danger is that deepfakes will ultimately become boring”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake evaluations: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it implies for climate change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of synthetic intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer researcher describes the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model all of a sudden attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has constantly been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was workable and typically identifiable. Large language models generate text that masquerades as real language with intention behind it, even though there is none, and their output turn up everywhere,” she composed. She gives the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dig,” in a way that individuals do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the frequency of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI designs collapse when trained on recursively created information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Threat to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered errors in more than half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was in fact AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an USA Today website. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Concerning your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI short article about women’s use of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news websites is publishing AI-written posts under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured using synthetic intelligence to produce fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are permeating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will update AI feature after inaccurate news alerts”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated presenters to check out the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Developed Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are surprised to find their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already getting into Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators alert AI might cause ‘destruction’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta strolled away from news. Now the company’s using it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A relative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.